翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Ford Model T engine
・ Ford Model TT
・ Ford Model U
・ Ford Model Y
・ Ford Models
・ Ford Models Supermodel of the World
・ Ford Modular engine
・ Ford Monday Night Football
・ Ford Mondeo
・ Ford Mondeo (first generation)
・ Ford Mondeo (fourth generation)
・ Ford Mondeo (second generation)
・ Ford Mondeo (third generation)
・ Ford Moss
・ Ford Motor Argentina
Ford Motor Co. v. NLRB
・ Ford Motor Company
・ Ford Motor Company - Columbus Assembly Plant
・ Ford Motor Company Assembly Plant
・ Ford Motor Company Assembly Plant (Atlanta)
・ Ford Motor Company Cincinnati Plant
・ Ford Motor Company Edgewater Assembly Plant
・ Ford Motor Company Lamp Factory
・ Ford Motor Company of Canada
・ Ford Motor Company of New Zealand
・ Ford Motor Company Philippines
・ Ford Motor Credit Company
・ Ford Motors F.C.
・ Ford MT75 transmission
・ Ford MTX transmission


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Ford Motor Co. v. NLRB : ウィキペディア英語版
Ford Motor Co. v. NLRB

''Ford Motor Co. v. NLRB'', 305 U.S. 364 (1939) is an 8-to-0 decision by the Supreme Court of the United States which held that an administrative agency of the United States government, seeking enforcement of its orders, cannot withdraw its petition or the transcript of the administrative hearing once these have been submitted to the appropriate court. Whether the agency should be permitted to withdraw its petition is a decision for the court of appeals, the Supreme Court said.
==Facts==
After the passage of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) in 1935, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) found itself attempting to enforce the law against hundreds of employers, most of whom refused to acknowledge the constitutionality of the NLRA or obey the Board's orders. The Board's practice was have its Economic Division study the issues and report to the Board; order its attorneys in its Review Division to analyze the case and report to the Board; review the transcripts of the field office trial ''de novo''; receive an oral report about the case from the trial examiner; and have the Chief Counsel's staff prepare a draft decision for Board consideration.〔Gross, p. 31-32.〕 But in ''Morgan v. United States'', 298 U.S. 468 (1936) and ''Morgan v. United States'', 304 U.S. 1 (1938), the Supreme Court held that parties in quasi-judicial hearings before the government had the right to be presented with the issues the government was considering, present the agency with a statement, review the proposed findings, review any tentative reports, and submit exceptions and argument to the agency before a final determination is made.〔Gross, p. 30.〕
The NLRB had ruled against the Ford Motor Company in a case involving strikebreakers. The agency had asked the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit to enforce its order, and had already submitted its trial transcripts and decision to the court. But now the NLRB worried that it might be found in violation of the ''Morgan'' rulings, which had come down after its submission to the court of appeals. The NLRB attempted to withdraw its transcripts, but the appellate court refused to turn them over.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Ford Motor Co. v. NLRB」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.